Search for: "Close v. United States of America" Results 101 - 120 of 1,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2023, 3:22 pm by NARF
State of Alaska, Dept. of Health & Social Serivces, Office of Children's Services (Indian Child Welfare Act) State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
By the 1950s, the persistence of laws codifying racial subordination had become an embarrassment for the United States on the global stage. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am by Yishai Schwartz
” The Second Circuit rejected this logic holding that Daimler—and its own related circuit precedent, Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:23 pm by Wells Bennett
By way of reminder, this week’s pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:47 pm
You asked all those years why the United States couldn’t be more like Sweden. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:38 am
  In the long run, this may result in an influx of European players to the United States, thereby creating the possibility of a high level of competition, prestige, and success for professional soccer in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am by Roy Black
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:20 am
The complaint (full text) in New York State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
To honor these men and women is to honor not only the United States of America, but to honor the freedom for which the United States of America stands. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It is heartening to see the likes of the ACLU and Americans United for Separation of Church and State and Planned Parenthood taking a stand against extreme religious liberty. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm by Peter Mahler
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]