Search for: "Coca v. People"
Results 101 - 120
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2014, 3:00 pm
With the preemption argument out of the way, the next doctrinal problem for Coca-Cola was the Court’s recent decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
Oralabs, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am
Coca-Cola (webcast available)Moderated by Prof. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Music service in copyright fightSocial media and disclosure in litigation: Garacci v Ross Contract requiring ex-employee to compensate former employer for competing ruled enforceable in BCNew Toronto police ‘carding’ policy could help repair relations with minority youth Should Law Professors Have a Continuing Practice Experience (CPE) Requirement? [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:27 am
Coca-Cola. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Q8: Name the pharmacist who invented the Coca-Cola formula. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:56 am
Bouchat v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm
YouTube is available on over 350 million mobile devices, and each week 100 million people engage in some form of social action on the video-sharing site, such as comments, shares, or “likes. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:25 pm
See, e.g., Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
[v] The U.N. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm
Groeneveld Transport Efficiency, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:52 am
Fisher v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:10 am
Coca-Cola * Court Rules That Instant Message Conversation Modified the Terms of a Written Contract -- CX Digital v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:07 am
”4 The requirement of a signed writing “is not only designed to protect people against false claims of oral agreements,” but it also serves “to make the ownership of property rights in intellectual property clear and definite, so that such property will be readily marketable. [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:58 pm
The court ruled in Commissioner v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:30 am
People usually think it's a good thing to be "on a roll." [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Coca-Cola Co., 679 F.3d 1170 (9th Cir. 2012) (discussed here), and VP Racing Fuels, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:55 am
In Coca-Cola Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 7:07 am
Bad faith actor v. good faith actor. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
In the absence of proof that real people were exposed to products that were unsafe or ineffective (instead of just improperly promoted), there is simply no injury, and thus no standing, for any sort of claim by a TPP or other beneficiary for purely economic loss. [read post]
