Search for: "Com. v. Childs, T."
Results 101 - 120
of 317
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 3:36 am
Back in 1994, in State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:38 am
It’s not, and it wouldn’t really matter if it were; as the court explains in State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:28 am
Johnson, the defendant’s attorney interviewed a child sexual abuse victim and obtained a written statement contradicting what the child had said earlier. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:37 am
The counts of felonious assault, domestic violence, and child endangering should have merged, but that doesn’t affect the length of Richmond’s sentence. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:45 am
Johnson, which held that felony murder and child endangerment should have merged. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:20 am
The lead pre-Rance case was Newark v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:35 am
Abubakar on the factors to be used in determining whether a defendant is acting in loco parentis for purposes of the child endangering statute… The 1st District finds nothing wrong with placement of a GPS device on defendant’s truck in State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:28 am
Not for now, though, and if one judge on the panel in State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:38 am
That could have been raised on appeal, but wasn’t, so our old friend Ray Judicata takes care of that… The 8th District holds in Cleveland v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:48 am
Jackson and State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am
The 1st District holds that that’s all the trial court could do; the judge wasn’t allowed to merge the defendant’s convictions for preparation for sale and sale of cocaine, and couldn’t make the sentences concurrent instead of consecutive… A trial court didn’t abuse its discretion in refusing to tell the jury that it had found the child victim incompetent to testify, the 2nd District holds in State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:38 am
Relying on the Supreme Court’s 1975 decision in State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:34 am
A closer look at the opinion, though, which I’ll discuss on Wednesday, shows that it really wasn’t that close. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 3:37 am
But that doesn’t conclude the inquiry, the court notes in State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:25 am
Hall contends that the judge was wrong about that, but the court holds that, to raise that issue, Hall should’ve cross-appealed; because she didn’t, the court won’t consider it… In State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:03 am
In a child porn case? [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:47 am
Bezak, State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:24 am
Yesterday, in State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:29 am
Welden… If you’ve got a domestic violence case involving a parent striking a child, take a look at the 3rd District’s decision in State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:42 am
The facts in the second case, Vaughan v. [read post]
