Search for: "Com. v. Long, S."
Results 101 - 120
of 899
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2011, 3:43 am
” The latter quote is from the Supreme Court’s decision in Beck v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:45 am
On the basis of a quarter-century old misdemeanor conviction, the government is apparently trying to deport Dobrowski, who’s obviously lived in this country for at least that long. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 10:35 am
It’s important to remember that the Court did not rule that adding “.com” to any generic term automatically qualifies it for trademark protection. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:29 am
 The Court affirmed California's three-strikes law in Ewing v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:54 am
In State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 6:38 am
" (Industrial Welfare Com. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:45 am
” In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Missouri v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:34 am
No. 293 v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
When the court wrote the opinion in the 1st District’s decision in State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 8:01 am
Com ex. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:06 pm
Now, in an unique moment of silence, of which it is sure to be interrupted, the AmeriKat has set out the tail of the Stanford v Roche patent assignment case, which was decided by the US Supreme Court on 6 June 2011. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:41 am
That’s the situation presented by State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:27 pm
Long before the Internet became a medium for defamation, the Supreme Court in Calder v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:24 pm
In the case of The HA2003 Liquidating Trust v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:24 pm
In the case of The HA2003 Liquidating Trust v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:47 am
You’ll remember that after the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:37 am
They don’t worry about that stuff in the courts of appeals, either, so let’s take a look to see what’s happened there… In State v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:25 am
Read the full text of the decision Kentucky v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:37 pm
From the Religion Clause blog (via my co-author Tom Baker) coms news of Nieto v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 1:44 am
The court says that MAI v. [read post]
