Search for: "Com. v. Strong"
Results 101 - 120
of 204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2012, 3:47 am
Given the the decision in Michigan v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Strong evidence—never convincingly refuted by plaintiffs—indicates, for example: Lawyers for plaintiffs forged the signature on the “report” of their expert, Dr. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:41 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 2:54 pm
& Com. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:43 am
Supreme Court decision Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
The division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 differed from the device of I2 […] in that it included the (additional and final) feature dealing with the relationship between the light output L and the signal level V. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
Alaska Public Offices Com'n v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:43 am
Still, the state’s got a pretty strong case: three eyewitnesses, a positive gunshot residue test. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:59 am
The publishing and academic worlds are watching the clock tick down to the perhaps historic decision of federal judge Orinda Evans in Cambridge University Press et al v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:49 am
Typical of those days was State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:46 am
The key case on this is Ake v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:45 am
Mike Masnick blew open the story on Dajaz1.com, which ICE seized on an ex parte basis, conducted secret proceedings for a year, and then gave back the domain name with no explanation. * Graduated Response. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm
Philip Lowe underlined that Member States were very much opposed to the idea of having binding targets formally imposed upon them in the field of energy efficiency: they would instead mark a strong preference for indicative targets.(7) Philip Lowe also pointed out that only 4% of small companies and 20% of large corporations established in the Union would already have a policy on energy efficiency. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
Grade: B Super Bowl VII 1972 This logo looks like the basic idea from Super Bowl V was copied and made a bit snazzier. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Hoboken411.com, LLC., FA1111001414530 (Nat. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
S. 188 (1972), and Manson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:16 pm
In the recent case of Varrenti v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:25 am
Call upon the States and Governments of the world to highlight the political importance of the Rio+20 Conference through the following strong signals: 1. [read post]
