Search for: "Companies X,Y,Z"
Results 101 - 120
of 239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
”How to respond: Select key work and education information that shows the hiring manager why you are a perfect fit for the job and for the company.For example, a recent grad might say something like, “I went to X University where I majored in Y and completed an internship at Z Company. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 9:58 pm
The letter X poses a huge problem here, seeing as how Black’s Law Dictionary includes only four words that begin with the letter. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:02 am
Internet research will give them a general sense of what a particular job pays, but it won’t tell them why your company at this moment is paying X for Y. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 6:32 am
Unfortunately, it’s not truly as “easy” as it might sound because “Falling Objects” can be defined in your policy, or policies can say “falling objects does not include [X, Y, Z],” or your policy can be completely silent on what “falling objects” even is. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 2:49 am
X amount in the U.S., Y amount in Europe, and Z amount in the rest of the world. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
Data Analytics What most clients ultimately want to know is that a patent litigation will cost $X through the Markman hearing or that an acquisition will cost $Y for Due Diligence, and $Z to close the deal. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:18 pm
” Although parties can choose to keep negotiations confidential, Brett said that “the point about this ruling is that it may form the basis of a statement by the newspaper – the newspaper may say we’ve been to Early Resolution and we’ve found that our article … has been take to mean X, Y and Z, we didn’t mean it to mean that, and we’re now saying sorry under Section Two of the Defamation Act”. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Z]. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:28 pm
They claim "The steps of making A happen by doing X, Y, and Z. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:30 am
With a central collection of up-to-date materials, attorneys will have less need for performing random Google searches or all too familiar “Does anyone have a recent form that does X, Y, Z” email. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 8:58 am
One lawyer was saying it said “X”, another said it said “Y”, and I said it said “Z”. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 7:51 pm
If all you describe is X that does A, B and C, then you never get protection for Y and Z, or for D, E, F and G. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
” Basically, it is saying that your bills say you did X, but you really only did Y, and Medicare paid more as a result. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:42 am
If I am proposing that the taxation of multinational companies' income by a given country should follow approaches A, B, and C, rather than X, Y, and Z, then I am in the normative realm, and a convincing descriptive explanation of why we in fact have corporate and international taxation would not be on point for the normative question, though perhaps illuminating it indirectly - for example, in terms of the set of feasible policies.Before I turn to the… [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 6:53 am
If I tell you that I am using tools A, B, and C to develop a solution that does X, Y, and Z. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:13 am
This approach has been deployed at scale by some insurance companies to automate the FNOL process and perform coverage checks. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Tx”. :: Y – Yawns. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:18 pm
Here’s the court’s theory: If a bunch of inframarginal consumers really like products X and Y but not similar-but-slightly-different-and-cheaper product Z, a merger between X and Y would enable the combined firm to gouge the inframarginal consumers, regardless of the effect on the marginal folks. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 3:57 am
Los hechos El señor Santiago Ortiz presentó mediante el procedimiento sumario de la Ley 2, una querella sobre despido injustificado y discrimen por edad en contra de Real Legacy Assurance Company, Inc. y la Cooperativa de Seguros Múltiples de Puerto Rico. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 10:02 am
Y is for YouTube, which was ordered to remove a video posted by a disgruntled law firm client. [read post]
