Search for: "Connell v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2006, 1:17 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Predicate Racketeering Activities Deemed 'Related'; 'Pattern of Racketeering Activity' Established United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 8:10 pm by Sean Hanover
The Appeals Officer further cites to Glara Fashion Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeTwo of Four Norwegians Can Be Deposed, Names Added to Witness List in Tax Shelter Prosecution United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
The idea was proposed to Span, which agreed on the understanding that the $300,000 would be paid back, the preferred units would be converted to common units, and Span would end up with a 10% ownership interest in Triumph. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 1:26 am
Cummings Fordham International Law Journal, Volume 29, Number 4, April 2006 Philip V. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:53 am by Amy Howe
  But any confidence that she may have felt was short-lived, as both Moskowitz and then Assistant to the Solicitor General Ann O’Connell (representing the United States, which filed an amicus brief in support of Alvarez) also faced a barrage of questions from all sides. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:26 pm by Orin Kerr
Third, the theories offered by the state and the United States as amicus curiae are in my view far too broad, but the best answer is actually quite tricky but should be rooted in causation principles.By way of full disclosure, I should add that I was approached by counsel for King for advice, and that I provided pro bono assistance to King in helping to craft King’s argument. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Vishnu Kannan
Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices ruled that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force, for this blog. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
He speaks to that briefly, and turns, at long last, to the arraignment of the accused in United States v. [read post]