Search for: "Consumers Power Co. v. Federal Energy Administration"
Results 101 - 116
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
The act is a violation of the Clean Water Act, the federal law aimed at protecting our nation’s waters. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:48 am
The scope of a president's authority to make law via executive order was analyzed in YOUNGSTOWN CO. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Spicy IP) PanIIT Alumni India leads the way in incubating ideas (Spicy IP) Rigging data: IPRs and the impact of counterfeits (Spicy IP) The Competition Commission: separation of power troubles again? [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
It is not surprising that the industrial codes resulted in restricted output, higher prices, and reduced consumer purchasing power. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Center for American Progress report a mixed bag of recommendations to Obama Administration (Patent Docs) Manufacturing letter on patent reform to President Obama (Anticipate This!) [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:06 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
The administration is supporting the manufacturer in that case, Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP finance),Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsICANN supports Google’s fight against domain-tasting: (Class 46),Global - PatentsSoftware patents and startup innovators: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property),Co-inventor: yes or no? [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
" Lamie v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:48 pm
It had the power to break up the spectrum and auction off each part separately. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
Union Fidelity Life Insurance Co., 439 So.2d 904, 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Liappas v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 3:23 pm
The energy providers then filed cross-claims for indemnity against two U.S. government agencies, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), as well as the British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority ("BC Hydro") and its wholly owned subsidiary Powerex.After the cross-defendants removed their cases to federal district court, the Ratepayers sought remand. [read post]
21 Nov 2005, 1:03 pm
The following Monday, October 17, a much-disputed new federal bankruptcy law took effect. [read post]
