Search for: "Contreras v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 10:37 pm
On page 3, that one specifically points to the Mannheim Regional Court's Nokia v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 2:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 4:22 am
German national courts would presumably apply the Sisvel v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
Contreras and Meredith Jacob, is a must read for those IP practitioners and scholars involved in technology development and standardisation.IP EnforcementWhen it comes to IP enforcement, Chinese IP maths: 3 + 15 = more than 18? [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm
’” Citing State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 5:43 am
In addition, the European Union, along with the United States and others, is currently involved in a dispute at the World Trade Organization (WTO) over China’s ASI procedures in these cases (a detailed discussion of China’s ASI landscape can be found here). [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 5:29 am
If, however, the controlled substances are smuggled in from another country (as in the case of Contreras) or transported across state lines, an indictment will most likely be brought at the federal level and will be result in severe federal penalties such as the one imposed on Contresas. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 5:18 pm
I.N.S. (9th Cir. 1989) 879 F.2d 561, 567; Contreras v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:08 am
In 2013 one employee fraud case did crack the Top Ten, so the record is now 49-1 (employer fraud v. employee fraud) over the past five years. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
Certification (and) Marks – Understanding Usage and Practices Among Standards Organizations, Brad Biddle, Arizona State University, Jorge Contreras, University of Utah, and Vigdis Bronder, Biddle Law Would expect to find certification marks going along w/standards orgs. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:17 am
In a related case, Committee on Ways & Means v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 11:05 am
That was the message from the Oregon Supreme Court last week when it issued its ruling in State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 11:12 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
State of California v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
