Search for: "Cook v. Fair"
Results 101 - 120
of 686
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2021, 7:21 am
All of the restaurants in a region cannot come together to cut cooks' wages on the theory that "customers prefer" to eat food from low-paid cooks. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 4:56 pm
Hldgs., LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 7:12 am
It's fair to say that at this point the question is most likely about remedies. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:07 am
" Cook v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 4:01 pm
Rosenthal's opinion in Cooke v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:47 pm
In the relatively recent Cook Islands case of Webb v Webb, the Privy Council ([2020] UKPC 22) considered the relevance of a New Zealand tax debt to matrimonial property proceedings in the Cook Islands. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
In Matter of Cook v Sierra, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 115878 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
In Matter of Cook v Sierra, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 115878 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
Cook County, Illinois, 20-450, involve the Trump administration’s “public charge rule. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 5:13 am
” Blumenthal v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Tallent v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 8:00 am
Bailey v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 28060-20 Sturt v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27845-20 Garrity v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27809-20 Levick v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 15320-20 Cook v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation… [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm
Cook Children’s Medical Center v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:54 am
Google Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 1:12 pm
Bryant initially filed a putative class action lawsuit in state court in the Circuit Court of Cook County. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 11:40 am
In Cook v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Loving v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm
The early judicial opinion in Cooke and Anr v MGN Ltd and Anr [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB) suggests that in cases involving grave imputations serious harm will be so obvious that the need for evidence can be dispensed with, such as where an individual was wrongly accused of being ‘a terrorist or a paedophile’ in a national newspaper (Mr. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
From United States v. [read post]
