Search for: "Cooper v. Oklahoma"
Results 101 - 120
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2014, 1:22 pm
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 10:00 pm
In In Cactus Drilling Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 12:34 pm
Jacobson v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative, Inc. (7th Cir. 1988). [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
The federal government allegedly is putting someone to a choice between compliance with a civil obligation and adherence to a restrictive religious injunction (roughly speaking: “Thou Shalt Not Cooperate With Evil”). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:04 pm
In US v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
Watson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:56 am
” Halliburton Energy Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:50 am
State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:41 pm
Oklahoma ex rel. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 4:20 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, 12-1094, which was granted the morning after its second Conference. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:19 pm
Oklahoma Bar Association v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
Cooper, 12-7516 (the Fifth Circuit state-on-bottom habeas case, now up for its fifth relist); and Harris v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
., you call the SG’s office in (say) Oklahoma these days, and the guy or gal at the other end is a gunslinger from Harvard Law School: that would not have happened two decades ago. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
Cluck v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am
McCann, Wayne State Univ: Between Thugs and Innocents: Racialized Violence and the Perogative of ‘Self Defense’ in the Trayvon Martin Case Robert Mills, Northwestern University: The Harmonious Vocalics of Judicial Unanimity: Authorship and Legitimacy in Cooper v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Oklahoma, 11-6589, which involves a claim that petitioner pled guilty based on her lawyer’s deficient advice about the sentence she would receive, for Missouri v. [read post]
