Search for: "Cooper v. Ross" Results 101 - 120 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
  Lyle has covered the controversy extensively for this blog; Ross Ramsey of the Texas Tribune, Michael Kirkland of UPI, and David G. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:35 am by admin
  Hamtramck and Highland Park were at one time factory towns – and Hamtramck has the dubious distinction of the site of a terrible eminent domain for economic development land grab, Poletown v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:37 am by Christopher Spizzirri
  In reading Cecil Lynn's excellent recent article on Law.com, Drama & Destruction, that provides a great rundown of 2010 case law, I came across this case summary: In Ross v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Steve Patterson, Jacksonville, July 20, 2010 Three years after being sued over pollution from its sewers, JEA agreed Tuesday to cooperate with environmental activists in looking for ways to improve its operation. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:08 pm
Cooper (1991) 53 Cal3d 771, 281 Cal Rptr 90. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
The Agency’s response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Augustine, FL 32086; Henry Street, North Liberty, IN 46554; 400 South Main Street, North Liberty, IN 46554; 5801 Riverport Road, Henderson, KY 42420; 1607 East Maumee Street, Adrian, MI 49221; 5375 North Riverview Drive, Kalamazoo, MI 49004; Sale Barn Road, Cassville, MO 65625; 808 County Road, Monett, MO 65708; 401 North Stolle Avenue, Sidney, OH 45365; 2490 Ross Street, Sydney, OH 45363; 9 Aluminum Drive, Ellenville, NY 12428; 117 Blake Dairy Road, Belton, SC 29627; 171 Industrial Blvd.,… [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]