Search for: "Cooper v. Superior Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2023, 3:01 pm
Superior Court (1997) 16 Cal.4th 880, 892 [“the California Constitution amply established the existence of a fundamental public policy”]; see Green v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 8:40 am
Sewell moved in superior court to suppress the evidence gathered after she was arrested on the basis that trooper did not have probable cause to arrest her. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:24 am
Superior Court of California, Tulare County, et al. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:24 am
Superior Court of California, Tulare County, et al. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
(B245131; 224 Cal.App.4th 1105; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS131347.) [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Cooper v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 7:10 am
Superior Court against the daily tabloid The Boston Herald and its "Inside Track" gossip columnists Gayle Fee and Laura Raposa, accdording to the Courtroom News Service(CNS).The 23-page complaint, Donald Thomas Scholz v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 10:03 am
In Scheenstra v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 7:07 am
However, as the Supreme Court explained in Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
”9 Defense counsel was sanctioned and ordered to cooperate in the immediate rescheduling of the witness’s deposition.10 Five years later, in Swenson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
”9 Defense counsel was sanctioned and ordered to cooperate in the immediate rescheduling of the witness’s deposition.10 Five years later, in Swenson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 9:50 am
Superior Court, 2007 Cal. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:01 pm
Anyone wishing to review this decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the case of Tayar v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:50 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Citing the 1999 Court of Appeals decision in O’Shea v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
” nb – court considers possibility that this evidence would have been admissible in discretion of trial court.PEOPLE V. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 10:00 pm
In C.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:01 pm
The Heebner court did not cite to the Marlette v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm
Interestingly, the Court was much more sensitive to considerations of context in its recent decision in NRA v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
It strikes me that, generally, many justice stakeholders have worked very hard and cooperatively to make things quickly work in an extremely challenging situation. [read post]
