Search for: "Correctional Officer Anderson"
Results 101 - 120
of 505
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
Circuit have held that the Speech or Debate Clause gives members of Congress and congressional aides and officers absolute immunity from civil suit for their performance of all “legislative acts. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
Most states additionally verify the identity of mail voters in one of two ways: by comparing the voter’s signature on the ballot return envelope to the voter’s signature on file with the election office to see if they match, or by having a witness or a notary public sign the ballot or return envelope to attest that the ballot was completed by the intended voter. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
For their undue burden claims, plaintiffs relied on what is known as the Anderson-Burdick test. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:25 am
Most of these cases lose at trial (who will believe the inmate over correction officers?) [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 8:10 am
Anderson will be discussing these articles and answering questions from Lawfare patrons at a Lawfare Live online event this Friday, Oct. 23, at 12:00pm EDT. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 5:45 am
The inequity was not corrected, despite Ms. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Sherry Perrault, head of ethics and regulation at the Standards in Public Office Commission, said she welcomed the announcement of a review of the post-employment provisions of the Regulation of Lobbying Act. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:45 pm
We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 11:24 am
Mel Bostwick, from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe’s Washington, D.C., office, presented argument for Apple. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:57 pm
Ironically, some of those same critics see no problem campaigning for highly political elected district attorneys to remake state and local prosecutorial offices in their preferred progressive image, which often involves overriding the considered judgment of the career prosecutors and police officers. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm
Office of Personnel Management’s Office of Federal Investigations (USOPM-OFI) as a special investigator retained by the USOPM and employed by U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm
Office of Personnel Management’s Office of Federal Investigations (USOPM-OFI) as a special investigator retained by the USOPM and employed by U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 10:03 am
.: The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) will sponsor a conversation between Davgin Anderson, commander of U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 1:13 pm
The litigation also raises the prospect of delaying a final ruling on the validity of the divestiture order to a date beyond the end of Trump’s term in office, should he fail to win reelection. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) calculated that—on average—LIHTC costs about $9.9 billion annually.[24] Before the TCJA, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) estimated that LIHTC transfers constituted $8.4 billion in forgone revenue in 2017.[25] The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that repealing the credit would increase federal revenues by $49.4 billion between 2019 and 2028.[26] Despite its dependence on private investment and annual (along… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm
” The Appointments Clause distinguishes between two types of officers: principal officers, who can serve only with the Senate’s advice and consent, and “inferior Officers,” who are subject to the same advice and consent requirement unless Congress “by law vest[s] the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:54 am
We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm
These officers, however, will often have immunity from the suit. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
(relisted after the May 21 conference) Anderson v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
[Further thoughts on the Tucker Act and Federal Question Jurisdiction] Last week I posed a question: "can a plaintiff seek compensation for an unconstitutional taking, without relying on the Tucker Act's jurisdiction–if not under the Takings Clause, perhaps under some theory of tort. [read post]
