Search for: "Counts v. Cooper" Results 101 - 120 of 1,036
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am by Roy Black
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Karen K. Hartford
The plan sponsor is: the employer, for a single employer plan; the employee organization, for a plan maintained by an employee organization; the joint board of trustees, for a multiemployer plan as defined in ERISA Section 3(37); the committee administering a multiple employer welfare arrangement as defined in ERISA Section 3(40) (“MEWA”); the trustee of a voluntary employees’ beneficiary association described in Code Section 501(c)(9); or the cooperative or association… [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 5:10 am by Ryan Goodman
Eastman’s proposals would violate several provisions of the Electoral Count Act. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 3:17 pm by CAFE
Code §192 - Refusal of witness to testify or produce papersUnited States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 3:17 pm by CAFE
Code §192 - Refusal of witness to testify or produce papersUnited States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
Counting last week’s Cawthorn ruling, Section 3 challenges have now generated two state and three federal judicial rulings—the first opinions on Section 3 in a century and a half. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Steyn v CRTV, LLC, 175 AD3d 1, the clause does not state that it encompasses "any and all disputes" between the parties and it does not explicitly delegate the arbitrability question to an arbitrator and the CBA does not evince a clear and unmistakable intent to arbitrate the Labor Law claims at issue here. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Steyn v CRTV, LLC, 175 AD3d 1, the clause does not state that it encompasses "any and all disputes" between the parties and it does not explicitly delegate the arbitrability question to an arbitrator and the CBA does not evince a clear and unmistakable intent to arbitrate the Labor Law claims at issue here. [read post]
29 May 2022, 8:42 am by Russell Knight
Burris, 273 NE 2d 605 – Ill: Supreme Court 1971 Failure to cooperate on cross-examination means the testimony elicited on direct-examination may be struck. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:54 pm by Andrew Hamm
These and other petitions of the week are below: Old Dominion Electric Cooperative v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 am by Elizabeth Whatcott
The use of targeted attacks against civilians, against hospitals, against maternity wards, train stations filled with people fleeing, deliberate use of sexual violence against the Ukrainian population as a way of creating, ah, of creating horrific scenes, the way that they’re attacking Ukrainian identity and culture – these are all things that are war crimes, that Putin is responsible for, these are all things that are crimes against humanity, and that’s why Canada was one of the… [read post]
16 May 2022, 12:47 pm by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  The one count Complaint seeks a declaration that no coverage is owed because Andrew Smith Co. failed to cooperate and because the policy is not triggered. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
  The one count Complaint seeks a declaration that no coverage is owed because Andrew Smith Co. failed to cooperate and because the policy is not triggered. [read post]