Search for: "Courts v. Smart"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2007, 4:59 pm
Supreme Court judges think they're soooooo smart, what with their 60 Minutes interviews and all that binding precedent blah blah. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 3:57 pm
Cartwright: I join fully in Judge Newsom's opinion for this Court. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 7:09 am
Under the Supreme Court’s two-pronged seaman test from Chandris v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:34 pm
One of the upsides of having very smart people on a court is that they can not only resolve particular cases, but also examine more broadly whether existing doctrine seems right and, if it's not, what went wrong (and when).It seems pretty clear that Judge Berzon's going to call for en banc review. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 11:50 am
by Dennis Crouch iRobot Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 3:39 pm
In January 2022, the question of whether a claim for damages arising from the Smart Card Chips cartel was time barred was heard as a preliminary issue in the English High Court case of Gemalto Holding BV and another v Infineon Technologies AG and others [2022] EWHC 156 (Ch). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:43 pm
Mark Lemley has a smart editorial up at Law.com on the hearings at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Viacom v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:44 am
Lawsuits over voice-activated assistants (and other smart home devices) are interesting. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:02 pm
One published opinion from the Ninth, and one published opinion from the California Court of Appeal. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:04 am
Smart Audio Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 10:16 pm
We review this exercise of district court sentencing discretion under the recent Supreme Court holdings in Gall v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 3:30 am
Professors Grossman and Thomas have written a wonderful article that describes how courts have applied Young v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 4:39 am
Owen Revocable Trust v City of Germantown Tennessee, 2019 WL 2233886 (TN App. 5/23/2019) [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am
After reviewing the claim construction briefs and stating that the briefs "well written and helpful," the district court, Judge Posner, stated that he had a concern regarding the proposed claim constructions. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:11 pm
At which point you sometimes realize, if you're smart: "Oh my. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 6:08 pm
Smart-Tek Serv. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:17 pm
Smart-Tek Serv. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:34 am
Smart v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 10:10 am
The case is entitled Samuel v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 6:30 am
A ruling last week by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in Citizens Bank v. [read post]
