Search for: "Cox v. Long" Results 101 - 120 of 432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2019, 10:13 am by Eric Goldman
Cox case, the court says that simply making works available does not constitute distribution. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Matthew Waxman
I have long wondered about the story behind Durand v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
Social Security And Taxes Many senior citizens preparing for retirement may not realize that their Social Security income could be taxable under certain conditions. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Uncertainty makes it v. difficult for nonprofits to provide a robust environment that we all depend on. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 1:54 am by Ben
The 4th Circuit took a long hard look at how and why Cox would be protected by US  "safe harbor" provisions that protect service providers from liability when users infringe copyright. - and here the Court ruled against Cox on a key point. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
It will hear that it is the role of the appellate court to either affirm the first-instance decision or substitute a new meaning: what it cannot do is weakly conclude it should not interfere so long as the decision reached was “open to” the first instance judge. [read post]