Search for: "Cox v. Smith-Cox" Results 101 - 120 of 152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by Mandelman
The Permanent Editorial Board of the Uniform Law Institute (you know what that is if you listened to my recent podcast with attorney Thomas Cox), has just a few days ago published a paper rendering an opinion on the Article 3 v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In Obsidian Finance v Cox (23 August 2011), the court ruled in favour of blogger Crystal Cox, who ran the website obsidianfinancesucks.com, where she published a number of serious and damaging statements about a bankruptcy trustee. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
By Thad Cox and James McEwen Ever since June 8, 2005, Representative Lamar Smith, then Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, along with several co-sponsors, have attempted to change the U.S. patent system. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Twenty Years After Employment Division v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
  Attorney Thomas Cox of Portland, Maine, who you may remember from the “GMAC uses robo-signers deposition” that brought foreclosures to a standstill last fall, says that in his opinion… “He (Judge Grossman) does the most thorough and competent analysis of the MERS charade that I have seen, basically concluding that the entire MERS business model does not comply with our laws, and that he will no longer accept MERS mortgage assignments in his court room. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
Only in 1983 did the General Assembly amend Section 401(a) to add the 90-days-before-filing alternative (see Section 401(a), Supplement to Historical and Practice Notes, Ill.Ann.Stat. ch. 40, ¶ 401 (Smith-Hurd 1985 pocket part)). [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:52 pm by Orin Kerr
Wilson, 163 F. 338, 340, 343 (CC SDNY 1908); Smith v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Beck, Esquire of the Erie, Pennsylvania law firm of Shapira, Hutzelman, Berlin, Ely, Smith & Walsh for forwarding this Order to my attention.Joseph v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:01 am
About 6 degrees off-beam should be okay (see Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith, here). [read post]