Search for: "Cruz v Brown" Results 101 - 117 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2011, 3:24 pm by Bruce Nye
  During his first two terms, Brown appointed Chief Justice Rose Bird (who brought no judicial experience to the bench) and Associate Justices Cruz Reynoso and Joseph Grodin. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:53 pm by John Culhane
Browning Courthouse in San Francisco, California. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Hopkinton, MA; Donald Brown, President) Arts Education Alliance Of Boston, Inc., The (Boston, MA; David Sullivan, President) Arya Convenience, Inc. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
” This justification for abdicating judicial responsibility is not only legally fallacious, it directly contradicts the clear legal precedent of cases such as Brown v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Cruz-Diaz, No. 07-1534, 07-1535 Armed bank-robbery convictions are affirmed, despite one bank teller's doubt as to whether the gun was real, where eyewitness testimony, the bank's surveillance video, and the discovery of a bullet casing in the getaway car were all consistent with the finding that the gun was real. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:05 pm
Brown, 4298, 5462/02, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 7793; 55 A.D.3d 393; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Cruz-Rodriguez, No. 052492, 052493 Convictions and sentences of twenty-six defendants for crimes arising from their involvement in a large drug distribution network that operated in a Puerto Rico housing project are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient; 2) the evidence failed to implicate one defendant in any conspiracy; 3) the evidence implicated a defendant in a conspiracy different from the one charged; and 4) district court committed a host of errors,… [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
De La Cruz, No. 06-1659, 07-2515 A conviction for drug-related offenses and denial of a motion for new trial are affirmed over meritless claims of error regarding: 1) a violation of defendant's speedy trial rights; 2) erroneous admission of evidence; 3) denial of the motion for new based on newly discovered evidence; 4) jury instruction; 5) ineffective assistance of counsel; and 6) whether the verdicts were against the weight of the evidence. [read post]