Search for: "D C
v.
State of Indiana"
Results 101 - 120
of 481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
While there are differences from state to state, the approach taken by most states with respect to the practice of dentistry is fairly consistent. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 4:20 am
Indiana, in which the justices considered whether the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states, that “[t]he unusual left-right coalition of organisations urging the Supreme Court to side with Mr Timbs—Christian conservatives, libertarians, anti-poverty activists, the Chamber of Commerce—seems to have the support of an ideologically diverse array of justices. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states, noting that “Timbs’ appeal to the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:32 pm
Andrew Perkins, Rochester, Indiana, Attorney for appellee.Pursuant to Ind. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:55 pm
On Friday, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) reversed the abatement in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am
C&D Zodiac, Inc., No. 17-1252 (are the objective indicia of non-obviousness analyzed only after a prima facie case of obviousness is established). [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
C. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
As a Section 501(c)(3) nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, we take no position on any pending legislation. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm
C&D Zodiac, Inc., No. 17-1252 (Process of obviousness analysis — is there first a prima facie obviousness analysis followed by consideration of objective indicia of non-obviousness?) [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
C. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:12 am
C., 476 U. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
United States, 17-1366, would justify readers in feeling a bit of déjà vu all over again. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm
” (William Henderson, University of Indiana) “Stakeholder associations should get together on a regular basis with American law schools. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
C. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
Opposing counsel: Leonard C. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court Is Likely to Uphold State Powers in Some Way The pending South Dakota v. [read post]
