Search for: "D and A Coffee LLC" Results 101 - 120 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
(Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Lanham Act claim based on bid to sell prison toothbrushes: Loops, LLC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 11:31 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
MOMENTUM 7196035 IMMORTAL IMPASSABLE MOUNTAIN 7195386 BELIEVE IN THE BURPEE 7195257 SCREENFIT 7194740 EUPHORIA MOTIVATION 7194445 WIGQUEENZ HAIR CO. 7194420 EVERYBODY’S SOMEBODY 7194222 7193963 HOME VALUE RENOVATION 7193911 HUMANATEE HOLISTIC HEALTH 7193901 ANYTHING BOATING 7193900 ANYTHING BOATING 7193778 HV HOME VALUE RENOVATION 7193684 FLAK-BAIT 7193543 GUTTERZ 7193501 ROWORLD GADGETS 7193415 FOR THE STREETS 7193360 CSPRING 7193331 SMARTCOVER 7193284 WELLPOINT 7192849 MICK’S PICKS… [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 11:38 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
MOMENTUM 7196035 IMMORTAL IMPASSABLE MOUNTAIN 7195386 BELIEVE IN THE BURPEE 7195257 SCREENFIT 7194740 EUPHORIA MOTIVATION 7194445 WIGQUEENZ HAIR CO. 7194420 EVERYBODY’S SOMEBODY 7194222 7193963 HOME VALUE RENOVATION 7193911 HUMANATEE HOLISTIC HEALTH 7193901 ANYTHING BOATING 7193900 ANYTHING BOATING 7193778 HV HOME VALUE RENOVATION 7193684 FLAK-BAIT 7193543 GUTTERZ 7193501 ROWORLD GADGETS 7193415 FOR THE STREETS 7193360 CSPRING 7193331 SMARTCOVER 7193284 WELLPOINT 7192849 MICK’S PICKS… [read post]
If I wanted to do a recruiting video for a new employee at a coffee shop, I’d want someone who radiates positivity. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am by Marie Louise
Fungoman LLC (Property, intangible) District Court M D Florida: Patentee entitled to permanent injunction despite granting earlier licenses where licensees and infringing party compete: Harris Corporation v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
Hydro-Quebec (Green Patent Blog) (Patent Prospector) District Court Colombia: Stryker’s challenge of USPTO ruling in bone screw interference struck down: Stryker Spine v Biedermann Motech (Patent Docs) District Court S D Florida: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from failure to pay maintenance fees and later revision of product packaging: Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 12:21 pm by Ruth Carter
One of the names he was considering had to be rejected because it was already registered by a coffee brand. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 5:41 am by SHG
Nice coffee shop you got here, little lady. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Through the 1985 amendment to CPLR 3101, of which subdivision (d)(1)(i) is a part, the Legislature intended to "expand disclosure" (David D. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
(patents4life) (IPKat) Michael Punke nominates as WTO Ambassador (Intellectual Property Watch) Disney acquires Marvel – IP contention ensues (Copyfight) (IP finance)   US Patent Reform Mike Drummon, Editor-in-Chief of Inventors Digest Magazine, joins innovators for patent reform (IP Watchdog)   US Patents Litigation rumours surface over Intellectual Ventures - Picture Frame Innovations, LLC v Eastman Kodak Company et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM)… [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
 For example, a coffee maker recently paid $25 million, including $8.325 million in attorneys’ fees, to settle a false advertising case where plaintiffs alleged that its coffee pods were filled with instant coffee rather than the labeled premium ground coffee. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
 For example, a coffee maker recently paid $25 million, including $8.325 million in attorneys’ fees, to settle a false advertising case where plaintiffs alleged that its coffee pods were filled with instant coffee rather than the labeled premium ground coffee. [read post]