Search for: "DANIEL v. DANIEL" Results 101 - 120 of 8,642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2023, 9:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 IP at the Supreme Court Series: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 2:45 am by by PritzkerLaw
The firm represents Salmonella infection victims throughout the United States, and has recently filed a lawsuit in Nevada (Shirley Shultz v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 12:10 pm
Rebekah Daniel served honorably as a Lieutenant in the United States Navy, and she worked as a labor and delivery nurse stationed at the Naval Hospital in Bremerton, Washington. . . . [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:18 am by traceydennis
Al Hassan-Daniel and another v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 1443; [2010] WLR (D) 331 “There were perceptible and sound policy reasons why the defence of ex turpi causa non oritur actio did not form part of the Strasbourg jurisprudence, save when the matter came to just satisfaction. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
As Chief Justice Marshall explained in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 6:20 pm by Mark Graber
  The Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:43 am by Eric Goldman
During oral arguments at the Supreme Court on March 22, 2023 in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:20 pm by Scott Hervey and Jamie Lincenberg
Supreme Court provided clarification on the application of the Rogers test in relation to Jack Daniels v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:42 pm
  So Daniels Sharpsmart gets a ton -- actually, 320,000 pounds -- of California-created medical waste, and instead of burning it, ships it to Kentucky and Indiana, which (perhaps not surprisingly) allow medical waste to be dealt with in a much more lenient matter.California tries to stop this scheme, but Daniels Sharpsmart sues, saying that California's attempt to regulate medical waste generated in California violates the Constitution; in particular, the dormant Commerce… [read post]