Search for: "DEFENDER SERVICES v. COOPER"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2010, 4:52 am
Cooper v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:21 am
Eurodif (07-1059), on whether contracts for uranium enrichment services are subject to federal anti-dumping laws. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
SIGNATURE FLIGHT SUPPORT CORPORATION, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 5th District.Contracts -- Staffing agreement -- Indemnification -- Error to dismiss with prejudice fifth amended complaint alleging defendant breached duty to indemnify plaintiff for claims against plaintiff which were caused by defendant's employees -- Although defendant contended that plaintiff was not party to contract, plaintiff alleged the agreement extended coverage to contracting corporation's… [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
(See Complaint in ZCS, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:16 pm
” This is hardly the kind of independent advocacy the Supreme Court was referring to in Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:34 pm
As the Appellate Division, Third Department, held in People v Wilhelm (34 AD3d 40 [3d Dept 2006]): we are satisfied that the CPS caseworkers involved here had a "cooperative working arrangement" with and were acting as agents of the police and prosecutor in interviewing defendant and relaying her incriminating statements (People v Greene, 306 AD2d 639, 641). [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 8:41 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 1:41 pm
posting and tracing back to defendant's computer and subscriber information from internet service providers. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 11:03 am
In Matter of Dunn, Lake v M.P.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:06 am
” The defendants appealed the sanctions, and in the case, Howard v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
The practice of stopping drivers to effect service of a subpoena was discussed in Lewis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:15 am
It found that a faith representative was available, and that plaintiff could file requests for other religious needs.In Cooper v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 3:30 pm
")Kremen v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 6:04 pm
Cooper Elec. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
See Cooper, 312 U. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
Miller v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 5:37 am
In Grigson v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:25 am
Alaska Supreme Court, 740 P.2d 437 (Alaska 1987) (court appointment of an attorney to represent an indigent criminal defendant was an unconstitutional taking); Stephan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:03 am
In total, a cooperating defendant will not be hampered by their pierced mandatory minimum in seeking a sentence reduction. [read post]
