Search for: "DH v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
From a Justice Department press release in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
As part of that review, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in consultation with the State Department and intelligence agencies, developed an information and risk assessment “baseline. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
This case involves approximately $7 million in welfare benefits paid by the state each month that may not otherwise have been paid if DHS is allowed to implement the contested eligibility requirements. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:25 am
Yet none but a clairvoyant could have predicted the aftermath on June 15, 1982 when the Supreme Court in Plyler v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
” Failures in planning and communications aside, the report found DHS in direct violation of two court orders, Louhghalam v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:28 pm
Supreme Court Upholds DACA for Now On June 18, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in DHS v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:28 pm
Batalla Vidal et al., v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
Citizenship and Immigration Services; DHS. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:54 pm
For example, in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
Schmitt, et al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 1:08 pm
The Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) reinstated his removal order. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:56 pm
Hettena v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 5:55 am
DHS (S.D.N.Y.) -- granting in part and denying in part government’s use of Exemptions 5 and 7(E) to withhold records concerning the government’s authority to from the United States based on their speech, beliefs, or associations.Broward Bulldog, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:02 pm
Canning v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 9:15 am
Mazariegos-Rodas v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:15 am
DHS (D.D.C.) -- holding that Department of State properly withheld records concerning plaintiffs’ visa denials pursuant to Exemption 3 in conjunction with section 222(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.Aguirre v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 9:15 am
Supreme Court asks the Solicitor General to brief the court on the views of the U.S. federal government regarding the Article III standing issues in Apple v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
She stated, “I applaud today’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Individuals who arrived in the United States after the continuous residence dates for these designations are not eligible for TPS. [read post]
