Search for: "DOE V US" Results 101 - 120 of 95,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2016, 9:40 am
 But the trial court finds out that the clerk has accidentally posted Doe's real name on a publicly-available document -- a mistake not of Doe, but of the court -- so says that Doe can't use a pseudonym anymore, since the cat's out of the bag.The Court of Appeal reverses. [read post]
The post US Supreme Court finds federal labor law does not automatically preempt state law claims appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm by ipandentertainmentlaw
Hallatt does not act to deceive his customers as to the source of the goods and he does not alter the goods or their packing. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 10:32 am by Legal Talk Network
After many years in the courts, a federal appeals court recently ruled that the project is fully protected by fair use and does not infringe on the copyrights of authors. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:17 am by Ken Lammers
The Judge in Loudon County mistakes the meaning and scope of Nelson v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 7:12 am
McNeece cannot be used for precedent, it does provide us with the law which can be used as precedent:Subject to two narrow exceptions, court orders for child support remain effective until a court changes them. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:12 am by Eric Goldman
by guest blogger Alexandra Jane Roberts When does using a competitor’s trademark as a hashtag create a false impression of association? [read post]