Search for: "DOE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY"
Results 101 - 120
of 449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm
” Peter Swire summarized his testimony on U.S. surveillance law before the Irish High Court in Schrems v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 3:26 pm
Army Reserves. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm
Army Corps of Engineers, 441 F. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 5:56 am
In 1941, but prior to December 8th, President Roosevelt promised Philippine soldiers U.S. citizenship and full veteran’s benefits should they serve in the United States Army Forces Far East (“USAFFE”). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:32 am
The secret-spilling site has raised the ire of the U.S. government and others around the world for its ongoing release of secret diplomatic cables allegedly provided to the site by Army Pfc. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:57 am
Michigan v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
U.S. officials stated that “the U.S. does not hold or control any of this money. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
U.S. officials stated that “the U.S. does not hold or control any of this money. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion and order in the case of Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In his merits brief in the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:13 pm
Army Air Corps to train British flying students. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
Written by the U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
In Odom v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm
On Sunday night, U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:06 am
Rita Miles of the Department of the Army, alleging that the Government (1) violated the applicable performance review procedures set forth in Army Corps of Engineers Regulation 415-1-17 and (2) arbitrarily issued evaluations unsupported by the facts. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:18 am
Danis Barona
BRONX COUNTYCivil Rights
Court Finds Res Judicata Does Not Apply; Complaint Is Different from Dismissed Suit
Matter of NYS Thruway Authority v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
In People’s Mujahedin Organization of Iran v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 1:10 pm
Defense Department, et al., v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:32 am
In Ali v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm
Section V: Retention An IC element may retain raw SIGINT for up to five years “after the information is first collected by NSA,” unless continued retention (for up to another five years) is approved in writing by the IC head. [read post]
