Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 101 - 120
of 32,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm
According to the ITC, "Smartphone companies involved in Section 337 investigations during the first half of FY 2012 include: Apple (14), HTC (8), Motorola (4), Samsung (3), RIM (3), Nokia (3), and LG (1). [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 8:40 am
” The ninety-day waiting period does not apply, if the divorce petition is filed for any of the following reasons: 1. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:11 am
[1] 8 CFR §214.2(o)(3)(iv) Tweet [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 5:03 am
How does your state rank? [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 1:47 pm
See IC 31-17-5-1.That statute does not state how a father is to establish paternity. [read post]
7 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
The SEC declined to issue the no action letter allowing for exclusion of the proposal under Rules 14a-8(i)(1), 14a-8(i)(2), 14a-8(i)(3), or 14a-8(i)(6). [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
And at this point in the state of Kansas, the HGN test has no more credibility than a Ouija Board or a Magic 8 Ball.The KSC held that the city had failed to make this showing:To be operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, pursuant to K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 8-1567(a)(1) or (2), the alcohol concentration in the person's blood or breath must have reached the level of .08 or more. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 1:11 pm
In an interesting decision yesterday, the Federal Circuit addressed an unusual procedural issue: does filing a motion to dismiss toll the time to respond to an amended complaint? [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 1:11 pm
Read 1 John 1:8-10. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 3:34 pm
1. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
The court ruled 8-1, against a debtor who wanted to shield some income from his creditor by claiming a $471 monthly allowance for a car payment. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 3:15 pm
1. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:26 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled 8-1 [opinion, PDF] Wednesday in Perry v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:23 pm
1. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:11 pm
The US Supreme Court [official website] decided [opinion, PDF] 8-1 Thursday in Pereira v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:36 am
1-8-2010 Nebraska:A hearing is scheduled in Lincoln County District Court on Jan. 14 that could [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
In a recent 8-1 decision, the US Supreme Court held that the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or the Act) does not preempt state claims against unions for intentional property damage during a strike. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
In a recent 8-1 decision, the US Supreme Court held that the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or the Act) does not preempt state claims against unions for intentional property damage during a strike. [read post]
31 Jul 2002, 11:00 pm
On August 1, 2002, CMS published final regulations that significantly change the previously established provider-based regulations. [read post]
