Search for: "DS v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2014, 10:42 am
  In the alternative, the Ds claimed to have acquired the land in question (including the proposed access road location) through adverse possession. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  In a timeline of self-execution, comes after Missouri v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
In addition, to rely on the New Rule 506(c), funds must amend their current Form Ds filed with the SEC to indicate that going forward they will rely on Rule 506(c). [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Southern Snow Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Milos Misha Subotincic v. 1274274 Ontario Inc., 2013 WL 3964994 (C.D. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 3:47 pm
The language used was that specifically suggested by the Court of Appeals in the case of People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
-> Konami Follows Nintendo As Victim of Illicit Login Attacks in Japan http://t.co/9iBjZqhIJ5 -> Nintendo Wins Court Case to Stop DS Flashcart Emulator Sales http://t.co/rYv0vo3Ly7 -> Economic Impact of Cyber Espionage and IP Theft Hits U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Prone to certification even after Wal-Mart v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:09 pm by Rosalind English
Similarly in DS’s case, profoundly disturbing though the offence of rape had been, it was not of the extreme level of seriousness to justify a whole life order. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Expression v. traditional advertising may have something to do with the differences here—NFU is problematic perhaps because it spans both types of uses, whereas Rogers is for expression that isn’t standard advertising.) [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:05 am by Kelly Buchanan
Statutes at Large, v. 8, at 444) was terminated by the United States because of Russia’s discriminatory immigration policies. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:34 am
Ds), but rather cares only about diversity of the claimants (here, amongst the Ps). [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 2:42 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Thomas v Jeffery & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 693 (31 May 2012) Cherry Tree Investments Ltd v Landmain Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 736 (31 May 2012) Generics (UK) Ltd v Yeda Research & Development Co Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 726 (31 May 2012) Patel & Ors v MRD Property Developments Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 727 (31 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Majeed v R. [2012] EWCA Crim 1186 (31 May 2012) High Court(… [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
David Carson, US Copyright Office: Small claims of all kinds are problems in federal court; one argument that might be helpful is that, at the moment, you have no choice but federal court for copyright claims; often people have state court as an alternative, which may depending on the state be more efficient/faster/cheaper. [read post]