Search for: "David v. Sullivan" Results 101 - 120 of 503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm by Jon Levitan
Early coverage comes from Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung of Reuters; Nina Totenberg and Hansi Lo Wang of NPR; Ariane de Vogue and Kate Sullivan of CNN; Pete Williams of NBC News; David Savage of The Los Angeles Times; and Adam Liptak of The New York Times. [read post]
7 May 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Williamson ruled that a claim against a truck driver's employer for negligent hiring, retention, supervision or entrustment cannot stand in the absence of a related claim for punitive damages.In the case of Sullivan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:04 pm
  David Por (Allen & Overy) explained that the Paris Appeal Court had addressed this in LG v Conversant: the implementer does not have to produce its licences. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Bauries, The Logic of Speech and Religion Rights in the Public Workplace, 19 Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review 137 (2018).Barry Sullivan, Prophesy, Public Theology, and Questions of Justice: Some Modest Reflections, (February 11, 2019).Mark Leeming, Injunctions Restraining Enforcement of 'Muslim Ban' Executive Orders, (Australian Law Journal, Vol. 91, 2017, pp 443-447).William Nichol Eskridge, Robin Fretwell Wilson & David Saperstein, Masterpiece… [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Blog Law Online has a post “Is New York Times v Sullivan in danger? [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The Court was told that the claim brought by Sir Elton John and David Furnish was close to settling. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Sullivan, 372, 327 U.S. 58, 70 (1963) and Organization for a Better Austin v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
Orin Kerr flagged two draft chapters he wrote on implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 5:48 am by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
Judge Sullivan then went on to question his lawyers: “Do you have any concerns that potential Brady material”—that is, exculpatory evidence material to the defendant’s guilt or innocence under Brady v. [read post]