Search for: "Davidoff v Davidoff"
Results 101 - 120
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2008, 12:23 pm
His references of preliminary questions to the European Court of Justice demonstrated, among other things, how effectively he could construct a set of questions in order to sharpen the minds of jurists in Luxembourg (as in Zino Davidoff v A&G) and how boldly (in Arsenal v Reed) he could resist their responses when it seemed to them that the senior European court had usurped his own judicial functions as a trial judge. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:47 am
In 1984, the Court of Appeals reiterated the rule in Davidoff v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:43 pm
See generally Unocal Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 12:09 pm
In Jana Master Fund, Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
His Lordship wryly observed that relations obviously weren't as cosy on the consent issue in Davidoff and how they really reached their low point in Arsenal on the badge of origin issue. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 5:06 am
Davidoff. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
Thanks to Steven Davidoff for the tip on the filing of the brief. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 7:29 am
See the recent Delaware Chancery Court decision in United Rentals, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Freed, Center for Political Accountability, on Friday, February 26, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 10:18 pm
In MetCap Securities LLC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:23 am
When Sky v SkyKick leaves rightsholders in limbo | The Intellectual Property Owners Association | Report on IPO’s 2018 European Practice Committee Conference (1/2) | Book review: Propertizing European Copyright – History, Challenges and Opportunities | GDPR notification | Thursday Thingies | Around the IP Blogs.Never Too Late 194 [weeks ending 13th and 20th May] Important amendments under Mexican law regarding patents, utility models and… [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:29 pm
[Guth v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
The Davidoff link is especially worth following. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
In particular the texts of the Trade Mark Directive and the Community Trade Mark Regulation should be rewritten to match what the Court of Justice said they actually meant in eg Case C-292/00 Davidoff v Gofkid [we've all got used to the law now, so it would be a shame to spoil things by changing it -- but hasn't the ECJ's ruling in Davidoff done quite a bit to clutter the register by extending trade mark protection way past that which the law explicitly… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:47 pm
TW Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
Dalsouple Société Saumuroise Du Caoutchouc v Dalsouple Direct Ltd & Another [2014] EWHC 3963 (Ch) is a 1 December ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, in which some of the best legal brains in that jurisdiction had to give some cogent thought to the meaning of the common-or-garden word "consents". [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 9:16 am
Here this included Art.5(2).* It appeared from Davidoff II that Germany had implemented Art.5(2). [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:11 pm
Last week, Advocate General (AG) Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered an important Opinion in Coty Germany v Amazon, C-567/18 [not yet available in English]. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:49 pm
• Kahn v. [read post]
