Search for: "Davis v. Bear"
Results 101 - 120
of 622
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
A few weeks back, in Meriwether v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:58 am
” The Federalist’s Sean Davis took these same malicious falsehoods a step further, insisting that I had lied to Congress. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
Robbins and Chevron v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
The High Court decided not to make such an order, following the practice described in R (Davies) v Birmingham Deputy Coroner [2004] EWCA Civ 207 (“Davies”): that, if a court or tribunal adopts a neutral stance in proceedings in which its decision is challenged, it will not be liable for the costs of the claim, unless there are exceptional circumstances. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:48 am
This is therefore an important aspect to bear in mind when declaring force majeure, as if challenged it will be necessary to support the declaration with hard evidence. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
” The challengers in California v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The SG relies principally on Alaska Airlines v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:43 am
But what if Kim Davis thought they were charging too much, or too little, for a 24-pack of gummy bears? [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 6:50 am
Davis, 223 N.C. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
Davis, 885 F.2d at 522. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 8:59 am
Davis in 2016. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 2:06 am
Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 U. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:39 pm
Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 10th and 11th Circuits, Davis v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
In the 2011 case of Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am
As a consequence, courts were urged to develop the notion of frustration of the contract, which allows for termination of an agreement when the circumstances are “in a fundamental respect different from those which were envisaged”.6)In the definition of Davis Contractos Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
FEC, Davis v. [read post]
