Search for: "Davis v. Brown" Results 101 - 120 of 668
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2021, 11:31 am by John Floyd
  403 Objections and Analysis   But as the Court of Appeals pointed out on June 17, 2021 in Brown v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 8:39 am by J. Alexander Lawrence
In May 2017, Jason Davis (age 17), Hunter Morby (age 17), and Landen Brown (age 20) were driving down Cranberry Road in Walworth County, Wisconsin. [read post]
18 May 2021, 8:39 am by J. Alexander Lawrence
In May 2017, Jason Davis (age 17), Hunter Morby (age 17), and Landen Brown (age 20) were driving down Cranberry Road in Walworth County, Wisconsin. [read post]
18 May 2021, 8:39 am by J. Alexander Lawrence
In May 2017, Jason Davis (age 17), Hunter Morby (age 17), and Landen Brown (age 20) were driving down Cranberry Road in Walworth County, Wisconsin. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am by Dennis Crouch
Justice BROWN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
Montana, et al.: Specific Jurisdiction’s Next Mile Marker (Nathaniel Fowler, Frost Brown Todd) We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
Eugene Davis authored an important special concurrence to his own opinion in a seaman status case, Sanchez v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
Eugene Davis authored an important special concurrence to his own opinion in a seaman status case, Sanchez v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
Eugene Davis authored an important special concurrence to his own opinion in a seaman status case, Sanchez v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
Eugene Davis authored an important special concurrence to his own opinion in a seaman status case, Sanchez v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Under this “classification-rather-than-class-of-persons” approach, if race is a problematic basis for sorting people (because its use historically has generated socio-political costs) in cases like Brown v. [read post]