Search for: "Davis v. English" Results 101 - 120 of 309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2023, 11:36 pm by Mark Keenan
In this blog, we’ll explore the case of MN v AN [2023] to shed some light on what Judges consider before making a ruling on a prenup in the English and Welsh courts. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by admin
March 28, 2013 Steve Szentesi & Mark Katz (Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP) (Upcoming note for Associations+) Just as with any other board of directors, directors of trade and profession associations generally owe duties of loyalty, care and skill to their organizations. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:30 am by admin
April 8, 2013 Steve Szentesi & Mark Katz (Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP) (Upcoming note for Associations+) Just as with any other board of directors, directors of trade and profession associations generally owe duties of loyalty, care and skill to their organizations. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:58 am by Graham Smith
Meanwhile in the UK the ISPs’ appeal to the Court of Appeal in Cartier v BSkyB (three judgments here, here and here) is pending. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
HITSELBERGER was then observed taking the classified documents from the printer, folding them, and placing them into an Arabic-English Dictionary and subsequently placing the dictionary into his personal backpack. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
The appeal is against the decision ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334) of the Court of Appeal (MacFarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ)  against the decision of  Warby J on preliminary issues ([2015] EWHC 2242 (QB)). [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 8:03 pm
Ziff Davis, held that the Mashable was not liable for an Instagram embed. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decision I Student essays: how to write a good piece? [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Those arguments are more relevant, and far more prevalent, in non-drug/device cases where the presentation of warnings is not minutely governed by federal law, and unlike prescribing physicians, there are plaintiffs who can’t read English, who have to deal with warnings in workplace settings, or who are just plain knuckleheads in using products. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) AAA v Associated Newspapers heard 17 to 20, 25 and 26 June 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Desmond v Foreman, heard 2 to 3 July 2012 (Tugendhat J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:08 pm by Jeanne Huang
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Schlunk decided by the Supreme Court of the US and Segers and Rufa BV v. [read post]