Search for: "Davis v. Scope Services"
Results 101 - 120
of 368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
Hardwick in Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:29 am
[Post by Venkat, with additional comments by Eric] Facebook v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am
In Smith v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
BackgroundCash Biz, LP is a registered Texas credit services organization that assists customers in obtaining short-term loans. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:27 pm
CenturyTel & Green v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:13 am
I presented with Mark Katz from Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP in Toronto. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 8:55 pm
In addition to LifeLock, the FTC complaint named co-founders Richard Todd Davis and Robert Maynard, Jr., who will be barred from making the same misrepresentations as LifeLock. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
Instead, he established an account with the commercial email service Gmail, which he used for official business. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases like Ward v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:19 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Fraley v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:29 am
When, as in Davis, the primary purpose of an interrogation is to respond to an “ongoing emergency,” its purpose is not to create a record for trial and thus is not within the scope of the Clause. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:14 am
Binnie J. stated for the majority, 34 When a lawyer is retained by a client, the scope of the retainer is governed by contract. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:43 am
Davis, 510 U.S. at 1318. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:11 am
Lady Rose also considered the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, s 15 (as amended by the Consumer Rights Act 2015, s 100(5)). [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
This is so because a valid license ʺimmunizes the licensee from a charge of copyright infringement, provided that the licensee uses the copyright as agreed with the licensor.ʺ Davis v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
THERESE UJOWUNDU, et al., Appellees. 3rd District.Jurisdiction -- Civil procedure -- Service of process -- Evidentiary hearing -- Although summons was regular on its face in contradiction of defendant's allegation, trial court erred in not holding an evidentiary hearing after defendant submitted affidavit of non-service alleging summons was improperly left on her apartment doorstepTIARA DAVIS, Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
” “It is well settled that “[a]n attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479,482 [1st Dept 2018], citingAmbase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:34 am
In Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 11:53 am
Davis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:23 am
That is the scope of the inquiry. [read post]
