Search for: "Davis v. State of California et al"
Results 101 - 120
of 129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2010, 5:38 am
John Boyle, et al., 100 Cal. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:38 am
John Boyle, et al., 100 Cal. [read post]
29 May 2010, 11:33 am
United States to Al-Haramain v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
“They are the patent examiners....They are paid by the United States of America. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
City of Joliet; Davis v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
Du Pont de Nemours & Co., et al., 82 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 1996) (applying Hawaii law); Jacobs v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
Only a few states allow retail stores or farmers’ markets to sell raw milk, while others restrict sales to on-farm purchases, or ban raw milk altogether (Oliver et al, 2009). [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
First, not all foodborne illnesses are reported to CDC as described by Mead et al (1999). [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:00 pm
Several authors have conducted extensive surveys of foodborne pathogens in bulk tank raw milk (BTM) and the dairy environment (Hancock et al 1998; Jayarao et al, 2006; LeJeune et al, 2009; Oliver et al, 2005; Oliver et al, 2005; Shere et al, 1998). [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 10:33 am
Parke-Davis, Division of Warner-Lambert/Pfizer Thomas Cona et. al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
SECREST et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.SECURITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2002-2 et al., Defendants and Respondents.No. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
Jude Medical (IP Frontline) (PatLit) District Court N D California grants summary judgment of invalidity based on on-sale bar: PartsRiver, Inc v Shopzilla, Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Illinois: Subjective colours require definition to avoid indefiniteness: On the First Ltd v Seiko Epson Corp (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Supreme Court asked to hear Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc – Should obviousness be… [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Kent School District, et al.; Kent School District, et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Supreme Court case that decided the presidential election, and by David Boies, who represented former Vice President Al Gore in the same case.The case is Perry et al v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 8:19 am
In Davis v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10… [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
Strang v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
In a study of E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks from 1982-2002, the authors estimated that half of the produce-associated outbreaks were due to produce already contaminated with E. coli O157 before purchase by the retail store or consumer (Rangel et al, 2005). [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
