Search for: "Day v. Greene" Results 101 - 120 of 2,933
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
Indeed, its basis rooted in the sensibilities and political outlook first crystalized in the Bandung Conference, also reflected the five principles  for peaceful co-existence developed in the regularization of Chinese Indian relations (as touchy as they remain to this day) and which now serve as the foundation for Chinese Socialist Internationalism: mutual respect for sovereignty, non-aggression, non-interference in internal affairs, and equality. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:31 am
Law Webinars - September 2023 Join Us for Constitution Day 2023 - Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 12:08 am by Frank Cranmer
Employment status of clergy again In Reverend D Green v Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, the issue before the Employment Tribunal at a preliminary hearing was primarily whether Mr Green, a deacon in the Church of England and, at relevant times an assistant curate in a parish in the Diocese of Lichfield, had the status to enable him to bring complaints of detrimental treatment because of making protected disclosures (whistleblowing) and… [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was a directions hearing in the case of Kent Police v Taylor before Nicklin J. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Frank Cranmer
: on Mrs K Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:25 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
It was obvious that these applicants would not receive their green cards during that time frame. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 2:29 pm by Barbara Machado*
The hope is that the enactment of these bills will (i) speed up construction, (ii) expedite court review, (iii) streamline permitting, (iv) address the cumbersome CEQA process, and (v) maximize federal dollars. [read post]
Indeed, the day after the proposed class action against H&M was dismissed, the same lawyers filed a similar lawsuit against another retailer in federal court in Missouri raising nearly identical claims. [read post]
Indeed, the day after the proposed class action against H&M was dismissed, the same lawyers filed a similar lawsuit against another retailer in federal court in Missouri raising nearly identical claims. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:42 am by Bob Ambrogi
Audience Chat Transcript 00:18:53 LegalType: The cat lawyer example also came up at Legal Innovators California. 00:23:07 Jennifer Carter: Isn’t negligence v incompetence? [read post]