Search for: "Dees v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
We also know that the President (the chief law enforcement officer of the United States) announced last February that there has not been a “smidgen of corruption” even though neither he nor the Department of Justice could have examined all the evidence, in particular the emails and other electronic information. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
That is what happened in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As it explained in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
In 1943, the Court in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
That is what the Court said in Buckley v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:39 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
Shaw's clearly established constitutional rights were violated – constitutional rights that were set forth in the seminal case of Farmer v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Such was the holding of the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its November 13, 2013 decision in Dee v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
 ”Because the University of Alabama is a state entity, it cannot be joined in a case in federal court. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 7:55 pm
Bruce testified that they never discussed these matters and I find that, given her attitude toward him, Dee was unlikely to have been interested. [read post]