Search for: "Defendant Doe 1"
Results 101 - 120
of 45,999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2008, 2:10 pm
Does 1-27, a case targeting University of Maine students, the "John Does" represented by Portland's Mittel Asen law firm have filed their reply memoranda in support of their motions to strike the Carlos Linares declaration, and to vacate the ex parte discovery order and quash the subpoena issued pursuant to that order, responding to the RIAA's opposition papersReply memo in support of motion to vacate and quash*Reply memo in support of motion to… [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:09 am
Defendant does not challenge Plaintiffs’ assertion that [the corporate parent] — not [defendant] — engaged in the prior commercial activity . . . [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:45 am
The court held that it was therefore “immaterial” to notify the defendant of the seizure. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 11:18 am
Does 1-5, the case targeting 5 Northern Michigan University students, the judge has denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint and quash the subpoena.February 22, 2008, order denying motion to dismiss and to quash** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->[][][][]-->Keywords: digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer… [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:23 am
Just writing down a detainee’s name and DOB does not mean he is not free to leave. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:51 pm
How does it work? [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:03 am
The Third Circuit does not have to decide the standard of appellate review of denial of a Franks hearing. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:01 am
Does 1-20, No. 08-2147, 2008 WL 2264485 (N.D. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 6:01 am
Does 1-11, the RIAA's ex parte discovery suit against Oklahoma State University students, the RIAA has filed papers opposing the students' motion to strike.RIAA's Opposition to Motion to Strike** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->[][][][]-->Keywords: digital copyright online law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie… [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 5:35 am
Does 1-21, targeting Boston University students, the students have filed a reply memorandum in further support of their motion to strike all of the Carlos Linares declarations.Reply in support of motion to strike Linares declarations** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]-->-->--> -->-->[][][][]-->Keywords: digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to… [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 7:06 am
How does a plaintiff add the nonparty as a party defendant. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
November 1, 2011) (unpublished).* After a traffic stop, National Park Rangers find a 57 year old defendant traveling with a minor he picked up in another state, who shared hotel rooms with her, bought a sex toy, and photographed her, was enough to show probable cause for a search of the computer in his car for child pornography, distinguishing other recent cases saying that sexual abuse of a minor does not automatically lead to the conclusion child porn was made. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 12:12 pm
(a) Rule 54(d)(1) gives courts discretion to award costs to prevailing parties, but this discretion can be displaced by a federal statute or FRCP that “provides otherwise,” i.e., is “contrary” to Rule 54(d)(1).Contrary to the argument of Marx and the United States, as amicus, language of the original 1937 version of the Rule does not suggest that any “express provision” for costs should displace Rule 54(d....Congress did not intend… [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:43 am
Unifrax I LLC, 1-14-cv-01250 (DED May 5, 2017, Order) (Andrews, USDJ) [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 7:09 am
[Plaintiff] does not allege that [defendant] had knowledge of, or was willfully blind to, the patents-in-suit at the time [plaintiff] alleges [defendant] failed to comply with [its patent clearance] internal policy. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:26 pm
Does 1-16, the case targeting SUNY Albany students, the appeals schedule has been extended on consent as follows:--Defendant's appellate brief due May 26th;--Plaintiffs' brief June 25th; --Defendant's reply brief July 6th.The stay continues in effect. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:58 pm
John Does 1-10, the Court has granted the motions of several defendants to sever, to dismiss the complaints, and to quash the subpoena.April 19, 2013, Opinion and Order, Hon. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 11:21 am
John Does 1-6, the Court has denied a defendant's motion to sever and quash.Order denying motion to sever and quash, December 24, 2012, Hon. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 3:02 pm
Seeking recourse can be difficult for defendants. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:34 am
Does 1-22, No. 11 C 2984, Slip Op. [read post]
