Search for: "Defendants Doe Corporations 1 - 100"
Results 101 - 120
of 907
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2015, 8:06 am
MYTH 1. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 12:11 pm
References 1. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:07 am
No. 99–508, § 103, 100 Stat. 1848. . . . [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 10:01 pm
The maximum statutory penalties for fraudulent distribution of adulterated meat are 3 years imprisonment, 1 year supervised release, a $10,000 fine and a $100 special assessment. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:24 am
The issue usually surfaces in one of two ways: (1) the majority owners named as defendants use their voting control to approve the company’s advancement and indemnification of their legal expenses or (2) when the company also is named as a respondent or defendant, even if only nominally, they use their control of the company checkbook to pay whatever portion of defense costs they decide to allocate to the company, which… [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
Why does that matter? [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:56 am
Plaintiff Williams-Bey, claiming special status as a "Moorish American," cross moves for an order directing Defendant to provide certain corporate resolutions and documents identifying its attorney in this litigation and whether other persons were authorized to act on Defendant's behalf pursuant to Not-for-Profit Corporation Law. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 8:00 am
Removing restrictions on insider trading does not open up more people to losses or being taken advantage of by corporate insiders, the laws around insider trading just delay the inevitable. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:40 am
No one will have a job defending corporations if there aren’t well-trained attorneys applying old law to new corporate wrongdoing. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Levesque, No. 081344 A forfeiture order for $3,068,000 for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana, is vacated and remanded where: 1) 21 U.S.C. section 853 authorizes money judgments; 2) the case is remanded to give district court the opportunity to consider whether and to what extent the ruling in the recent Supreme Court case, US v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:38 am
“[T]he need for individual damages calculations does not, alone, defeat class certification. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 9:47 pm
When she was 18, she took her father's car without his permission (he called 9-1-1 to report her) and took it on a joy ride. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:55 am
Charges didn’t need to name affiliated corporations. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 7:27 pm
See footnotes 100 and 101. [read post]
13 May 2013, 10:00 pm
Every corporate defendant who goes to trial can and should raise all procedural and factual defenses available to it. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 6:58 am
., and DOES 1 through 100, as follows: Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and upon such information and belief allege, that at the times and places mentioned herein, defendants were the agents, servants, and employees of the remaining defendants, and each of them, and each of them were at all times and places mentioned herein acting within the purpose and scope of said agency, service and employment. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
(Backer, Larry Catá, The Cooperative as Proletarian Corporation: Property Rights between Corporation, Cooperatives and Globalization in Cuba. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:59 am
" "A receiver or trustee representing a bankrupt corporation generally does not have standing to assert claims against third parties for defrauding the corporation where the third parties assisted corporate managers in committing the alleged fraud. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
NJ Sept. 1, 2011). [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
§ 1592(a)(1)(B) or by piercing the veil of the corporate importer, and had never advanced the court’s theory. [read post]
