Search for: "Denis Cain"
Results 101 - 120
of 251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his “opportunity to be heard,” contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his “opportunity to be heard,” contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his “opportunity to be heard,” contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Finally, as Lyle reported yesterday, the Court denied review in Jones v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his “opportunity to be heard,” contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
” The Court denied cert. in June on a very similar issue involving California’s efforts to affect production beyond its borders in Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his “opportunity to be heard,” contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:17 pm
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his “opportunity to be heard,” contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
Defense Attorney: Candace Cain 5. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
Cain, 533 U.S. 656, 666 n.7 (2001); Beard v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 8:24 am
Last week I posted an article about apparent authority of a member or manager of an Indiana limited liability companies to bind the LLC, usually by signing a contract on behalf of the company, including a discussion of a 2013 decision of the Indiana Court of Appeals, Cain Family Farms vs. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 11:42 pm
Indeed, the only Indiana decision to address Section 3-1.1, Cain Family Farm, L.P. vs. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
Cain, 2014 U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:45 am
Then came the Martin Cain amicus filing. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Cain and Jean C. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Harrington, 726 F.3d 921, 932 (7th Cir. 2013) (because "the state court’s decision denying post-conviction relief violated § 2254(d)[]," it was appropriate to consider de novo "the evidence presented at the federal evidentiary hearing"); Stitts v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:22 am
The motion court denied plaintiff's motion insofar as it sought the entire claims file and the handling claim rep's deposition.In MODIFYING the order appealed from to grant plaintiff's motion to compel production of the entire claims file and the handling claim rep's deposition, the Fourth Department held:Given the scope of the liability and damages issues framed by the pleadings, we conclude that plaintiff's request for the entire claim file was not palpably improper and that the… [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
Cain, 132 S. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
This is how the rule of law works: we extend rights to the very people who would deny us those rights if they had the chance. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Cain, 12-10251, a prisoner-on-top capital habeas petition involving procedural default rules, was denied without comment. [read post]
