Search for: "Department of Commerce v. New York" Results 101 - 120 of 753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Brianna Cea and Thomas Wolf weigh in on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
The New York Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources for individuals with cerebral palsy within the State of New York. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
This week I submitted an amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in a particularly interesting appeal in New York's Appellate Division, Second Department, which is an intermediate court of appeal. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:43 pm by Mark Walsh
Today is the oral argument in one of the term’s biggest cases, Department of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
New York, which the Supreme Court is expected to decide this week. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
[Professor Natelson versus Professor Ablavsky] The Indian Commerce Clause will be a major issue in the Nov. 9 Supreme Court argument in Brackeen v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:48 pm
 In 2012 the ban became effective and was immediately challenged by a Canadian trade group, (the Association des Éleveurs de Canards et d'Oies du Québec), a New York-based foie gras producer (Hudson Valley Foie Gras, LLC), and a chain of Californian restaurants. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
City of New York, USCA, 2nd Circuit, 08-1839-cv, Decided November 11, 2010The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a District Court ruling enjoining the City of New York and the New York City Police Department from investigating and disciplining a New York City police officer based upon testimony or participation in a pending lawsuit, concluding that hearsay testimony is admissible to support the issuance of a preliminary… [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
This morning, the justices will hear 80 minutes of argument in one of the term’s marquee cases, Department of Commerce v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:07 pm
Slip Op. 04984 (June 18, 2009), New York’s Appellate Division, First Department, held that an insurer has no duty to defend its insured against an affirmative defense based on a claim of offset raised in the responsive pleadings. [read post]