Search for: "Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of University of California" Results 101 - 120 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Regents of the University of California, “would harm the nation’s ability to respond to the pandemic created by the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:57 am by Brett Holubeck
National Association of African American-Owned Media), whether the court can review the decision to end the DACA and whether that is lawful (Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm by Jaclyn Kelley-Widmer
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
Last up is Shabo v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Lukas Gemar
Regents of the University of California, in which the Court prevented the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from ending Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), a program that protects children of undocumented immigrants from removal. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
He reported that the Department of Homeland Security had collaborated with state, local, and tribal officials on addressing those impacts, including federal aid for law enforcement and the placement of released noncitizens and their families at locations in the U.S. interior. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
Remember United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
Regents of the University of California—a case about a DHS memo rescinding another well-known but separate policy known as DACA—the Court found here that the DHS secretary had issued his second Remain in Mexico memo with several new explanations for ending MPP. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
Structurally, the INA provides that asylum seekers who arrive in the U.S. without documentation may be placed into summary proceedings called expedited removal proceedings, and that “other aliens” arriving from a contiguous territory may be returned to such territory pending full removal proceedings.[2] Under MPP, however, the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) sought to effectively transform individuals in the “arriving asylum… [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am by Adam Feldman
Kansas DACA and the nondelegation doctrine in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]