Search for: "Department of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information Commission " Results 101 - 120 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has published the outcome of a compulsory audit of the Department for Education DFE carried out in February 2020. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am by Anushka Limaye
WHO MAY APPLY: Open to the public. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 11:03 am by Gene Takagi
Mederos (requirements were narrowly tailored to further the important governmental interest of promoting an informed electorate); Lakewood Citizens Watchdog Group v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Bird 100 So 2d 57 (Fla 1958), Arkansas Commemorative Commission v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:44 am by Emma Snell
The committee has informed the Justice Department of the approach. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
 Events On Monday 5 December 2022, the LSE Department of Media Communications is holding an event to celebrate the legacy of Professor Emerita, Robin Mansell. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya also covers the outcome of the Cabinet Office’s review of the Government’s Freedom of Information (FOI) “Clearing House” process. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Planning & Zoning Commission, 285 Conn. 381, 399-400 (2008); see also Mayock v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am by Sam Murrant
Tom Hickman, writing for the UK Constitutional Law Group blog, posted this week on how data protection (or over-protection, as he argues) law may in fact suppress freedom of information and allow governments to hide information behind human rights to privacy. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Clayton County, GA (No. 17-1618) and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
  Links to all previous editions are available in our SCOTUSwiki archive. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:07 am by Federal and Extradition Defense
Detention in custody can be justified only if it is necessary: (a) to ensure attendance in court; or (b) for the protection or safety of the public; or(c) to maintain confidence in the administration of justice considering the strength of the case, the gravity of the offence, the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence, and the length imprisonment on conviction. [read post]