Search for: "Des Moines Independent Community School District"
Results 101 - 120
of 154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
Des Moines Independent Community School District supports discipline for off-campus conduct. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:33 pm
Des Moines Independent Community School District case. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
” For the young people here, no matter your political affiliation, I can tell you that involvement in a presidential campaign was exciting — not for the chance to personally interact with the candidate or help develop his positions on issues; the best experiences were canvassing door to door with my kids in northwest Des Moines and northeast Philadelphia; personally observing the Iowa caucus take place in a high school cafeteria; and passing out leaflets… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:20 pm
Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503, which is arguably the most important Supreme Court case on school regulation of student speech. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:18 pm
Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503, which is arguably the most important Supreme Court case on school regulation of student speech. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 2:07 pm
Des Moines Independent Community School District 393 U.S. 503 (1969) to their decisions a few weeks ago to uphold student free speech in the MySpace cases and clearly declare in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 10:30 am
Des Moines Independent Community School District, because it does not pertain to online speech. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 1:01 pm
Des Moines Independent Community School District. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Des Moines Independent Community School District, a 1969 Supreme Court case defining students’ free speech rights in conjunction with a black armband protest against the Vietnam War. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Des Moines Independent Community School District, a 1969 Supreme Court case defining students’ free speech rights in conjunction with a black armband protest against the Vietnam War. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:46 am
Des Moines Independent Community School Dist. (1969), which allows a “heckler’s veto” in K-12 school: Schools may indeed restrict student speech when it’s likely to cause substantial disruption, even when the disruption stems from other students’ hostility to the speech. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
Des Moines Independent Community Schools District 393 U.S. 503 (1969), students do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate and that in order for public schools to justify censoring speech, they "must be able to show that [their] action was caused by something more than a mere desire to avoid the discomfort and unpleasantness that always accompany an unpopular viewpoint. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:32 pm
Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) applies to online student speech that originates off campus and targets a member of the school community; and (2) whether and how the Court’s decision in Bethel School District No. 403 v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:07 am
Des Moines Independent Community School District, applied the “adverse action” analysis “in light of the special characteristics of the school environment”. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm
Des Moines Independent School District. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
Under the true-threat standard, `statements where the speaker means to communicate a serious expression of an intent to com [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:36 pm
Des Moins Independent Community School District — which held that public school students have a right to speak freely, with the exception of speech that is illegal or causes a substantial disruption — should be the standard for off-campus speech. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:16 am
Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:01 pm
Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:40 am
Des Moines Independent Community School District, because it does not pertain to online speech. [read post]
