Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs" Results 101 - 120 of 3,911
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am by Peter Mahler
(More recent authority echoing Widewaters includes Doyle v ICON, LLC, 103 A.D.3d 440, 959 N.Y.S.2d 200(1st Dept. 2013), where the First Department wrote, “Plaintiff’s allegations that he has been systematically excluded from the operation and affairs of the company by defendants are insufficient to establish that it is no longer ‘reasonably practicable’ for the company to carry on its business, as required for judicial dissolution under [LLCL] § 702. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 1:03 pm by John Ross
Dissent: Interesting conclusion, but the plaintiffs don't have standing. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  And what current courts call “likely confusion” would be unrecognizable to Founding-era courts—or post-Reconstruction courts—both of which protected trademark owners in far more limited circumstances: only in cases of “passing off,” where the defendant’s goods would substitute for purchases of the plaintiff’s goods. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm by John Ross
The city's decisions about what art to purchase and display are gov't speech, so the First Amendment doesn't apply. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 4:57 pm by Bryan West
Builders’ Liens The plaintiffs were no more successful in their claim of valid and subsisting builders’ liens. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
That still does not negate the negligence — both direct and vicarious liability. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:26 am by Eric Goldman
”…Most individuals who use email are likely familiar with having engaged with an entity one time (such as by purchasing a particular product) only to have that entity send numerous other emails, many or all of which are no longer relevant or wanted. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 1:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The report notes that direct action plaintiffs are most often institution investor opt-outs. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 5:58 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Aug. 31, 2023), plaintiff purchased a home at auction and later brought this claim against defendant, who marketed and facilitated the auction. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In another incident, an NAACP member took a bottle of whiskey from a black man who had purchased it in a white-owned store. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 1:10 pm by Unknown
Pirani to narrow the traceability requirement imposed on plaintiffs in Section 11 cases.The rulemaking petition asks the Commission to amend Rule 144 to limit sales of unregistered securities after the effectiveness of a registration statement. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 9:03 pm by Meredith Ervine
Pirani, the Working Group on Investor Protection in Public Offerings, which includes academics, former SEC officials, and legal scholars, submitted a rulemaking petition urging the SEC to amend Rule 144 given the difficulties plaintiffs face in trying to trace their purchases to a registration statement. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 8:15 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  To help patients afford the copays and deductibles for specific medications, some drug manufacturers offer direct financial assistance, often as coupons, to subsidize the patient’s purchase of the drug at the point of sale. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 10:17 am by Eric Goldman
According to Liapes, the coding in Facebook’s platform identifies each type of business, including insurance advertisers, that purchases ads. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:22 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Plaintiff was cautioned about the importance of this issue at trial and was directed to provide authority in her post-trial brief demonstrating that privity is not required to obtain rescissory relief. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:15 am by Law Office of Ray Garcia, P.A.
In this case, the business entity would be the defendant, and the owner would be the plaintiff. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:37 pm by Amy Howe
Lockheed Martin, involving whether a foreign government’s purchase of military equipment from a U.S. supplier is “commercial activity” for which they can be sued in U.S. courts Dermody v. [read post]