Search for: "Distinctive Personnel, Inc. "
Results 101 - 120
of 301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Production Control Services, Inc. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
L'Oreal USA, Inc., supra, 36 Cal.4th 1028, 1042, and other cases. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:57 am
In Oceana, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:28 pm
International, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 12:39 am
Barbara Cubin (PDF 56.4 KB) Letter requests additional meetings be scheduled in Wyoming RE: the Department of Interior's proposal to delist the Northern Rocky Mountain Distinct Population Segment of gray wolves 02/08/2007
Legislative Text of S. 485, the "Global Warming Reduction Act of 2007" (PDF 134 KB) Introduced by Sens. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:53 am
ICE Industries, Inc. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm
As I’ll discuss in other posts, it would entrench the economic positions of the current major platforms, make life difficult or impossible for smaller ones, and erode the distinctions between big platforms and the state. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:46 pm
LIRC (Beres), Appeal No. 2016AP1365, and Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:30 am
Apple, Inc., 2022 U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:38 pm
” Perhaps even more surprising, Hanginout submitted a specimen of use showing this self-inflicted descriptive use of its claimed inherently distinctive mark, three days before Thanksgiving. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:42 am
Covenant Care, Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 4:45 am
., Inc. d/b/a Atlas Roofing Corp., the Lucas County Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of the lawsuit and Perron's treatment as lawful. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
Circuit stated that “the primary purpose test, sensibly and properly applied, cannot and does not draw a rigid distinction between a legal purpose on one hand and a business purpose on the other. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 11:21 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
Circuit stated that “the primary purpose test, sensibly and properly applied, cannot and does not draw a rigid distinction between a legal purpose on one hand and a business purpose on the other. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 10:11 am
"] So held Delaware state court judge Eric Davis yesterday, in US Dominion, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 6:52 am
Sterling Jewelers, Inc., November 16, 2015, Rakoff, J.). [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:00 pm
Burkmann Industries Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:09 am
Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., August 14, 2015, Pooler, R.). [read post]
