Search for: "District Photo Inc" Results 101 - 120 of 1,515
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
” The indictment and its accompanying “statement of facts” accuse Trump of orchestrating a “catch and kill” scheme with his fixer Michael Cohen, American Media, Inc. [read post]
22 May 2023, 1:38 am by Aaron Moss
” Andy Warhol Foundation For Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The best my research could uncover were: Matter of Taines v Gene Barry One Hour Photo Process, Inc., where the court refused to grant the purchasing shareholders lenient payment terms based on their oppressive conduct (123 Misc 2d 529, 539 [Sup Ct, NY County 1983]); Matter of Elniski v Niagara Falls Coach Lines, Inc., which allowed installment payments (101 AD3d 1722, 1722 [4th Dept 2012]); and In re Rapid Recovery Enterprises, Inc., which… [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Richard Hunt
I found it interesting that one of his recent complaints, filed against La Pupusa Loca (Case No. 4:23-cv-01340 in the Southern District of Texas) includes photos of the defendant restaurant intended to show it has no accessible parking. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am by Eric Goldman
  But it was not a claim filed by Oppenheimer, but a claim referred to the CCB from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:41 am by Gretchen Knaut
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is nearing what could be the first criminal indictment of a former U.S. president in history. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am by madeo-design
Major League Baseball Player Relations Committee, Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 7:46 am by Larry
Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm by Aaron Moss
Central District of California Judge John Kronstadt is scheduled to hear Wagging Tails’ injunction motion on March 20 in Los Angeles. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am by Andy Wright
The federal district court then indicated its agreement with the government stating that the plaintiff’s claims against the former vice president and members of Congress were “likely barred by absolute legislative immunity under the Speech or Debate clause. [read post]