Search for: "District of Columbia v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board" Results 101 - 120 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Dudas Issue: Whether the director of the Patent and Trademark Office lacked constitutional authority to appoint members of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, and, if so, whether the board’s decision below must be vacated as a result. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
NGO objects to APEDA’s requirements (Spicy IP) Liberalisation of foreign technology agreement policy (Spicy IP) Copyright Board: Need for speed? [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 9:06 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that a case-by-case analysis is required to determine if the remedy is appropriate. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm by Mark Walsh
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in National Parks & Conservation Association v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Title690 S1325B LANZA -- Creates the thirteenth judicial district consisting of the county of Richmond 689 S6521 MAZIARZ -- Makes provisions for the deaths or permanent or temporary disabilities of employees of voluntary hospitals in connection with the World Trade Center attacks 688 S6514 NOZZOLIO -- Relates to compensation, benefits and conditions of employment for certain state officers and employees who are members of the… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Such bylaws are considered “flexible contracts” with shareholders that allow the board to change or add bylaws without interfering with any “vested rights” of shareholders. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
District Court for the District of Columbia to the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(Class 46) Council Regulation 1229/2008 enters San Simón da Costa (PDO), Ail blanc de Lomagne (PGI), Steirischer Kren (PGI) into Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Class 46) Court of First Instance, consolidating four appeals, annuls decisions of Board of Appeal and awards costs to Budvar in proceedings over BUD appellation: Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik v… [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In Eldridge v British Columbia, the Court found that the failure of hospitals to provide sign-language services for hearing-impaired patients was a violation of section 15. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Under the settlement filed in federal court in Columbia, S.C., Norfolk Southern will be required to pay a civil penalty of $3,967,500 for the alleged CWA violations, to be deposited in the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
Manning, 14-1132; and Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]