Search for: "District of Columbia v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board"
Results 101 - 120
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2013, 4:18 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia affirmed the ARB’s decision. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:16 am
In a groundbreaking opinion, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals has ruled that three appointments of officers to the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board” or the “NLRB”) by President Barrack Obama were unconstitutional because they lacked the “Advice and Consent” of the Senate and were not authorized by the Constitution’s so-called Recess Appointments Clause. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:55 am
Ten days after Outland was decided, the United States District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit determined that the President Obama’s recess appointments in January 2012 were illegal and therefore NLRB has not had a working quorum since the end of Member Becker’s term at the end of December, 2011. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
And, most recently, the United States District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia determined that President Obama’s recess appointments in January 2012 were illegal. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 1:08 pm
The British Columbia Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, basically for two reasons. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 4:02 pm
Toronto Catholic District School Board, 2012 SCC 51 which addressed a number of thorny issues relevant to commercial real estate disputes including whether a Plaintiff must mitigate its damages where it has made a claim for specific performance of a real estate contract. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:54 am
Phoebe Putney Health, No. 11-1160, on appeal from an execrable pair of opinions in the Eleventh Circuit and the Middle District of Georgia. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:58 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has ruled that employees of a contractor working for a contract restaurant operator located in another employer’s hotel/casino, have a right to pass out handbills inside the hotel/casino at the entrance to the restaurant. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 5:52 pm
Shaw, Professor of Professional Practice at Columbia Law School; “Of Counsel” to Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP; and an American Constitution Society Board Member. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:21 am
In a long-awaited ground-breaking decision, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals today held that an employer engages in unlawful retaliation when it adds a new demand for a release as a condition for concluding a consulting agreement. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am
California, 11-290) argued that the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:16 pm
On review, the Appellate Division adopted, with modifications, a four-factor test that had been applied by the federal district court in the Northern District of California in Columbia Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:17 pm
(Orin Kerr) In Kappos v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
Plaintiffs cannot directly sue people for exercising their democratic right to participate in the political process, though they can frame those activities perceived to be contrary to their interests as torts.[15] Common torts that are used by plaintiffs include: defamation, inducing breach of contract, conspiracy, trespass, nuisance, and interference with contractual relations.[16] Examples of SLAPP lawsuits include framing boycotts as intentional interference with economic relations[17]… [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia to the U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
An administrative law judge, the Departmental Appeals Board, and the Sixth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
An administrative law judge, the Departmental Appeals Board, and the Sixth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 11:25 am
The plaintiffs have appealed to the California Court of Appeal Columbia Physical Therapy v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:55 am
However, on July 22, 2011, in an opinion that called the SEC’s rulemaking “arbitrary and capricious” and reflected sharp criticism of the agency, a three-judge panel of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals struck down the SEC’s rule. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
