Search for: "District of Columbia v. Hunt" Results 101 - 120 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, "banning from the home the most preferred firearm in the nation to keep' and use for protection of one's home and family, ' [Parker v District of Columbia,] 478 F3d [370] at 400 [DC Cir 2007], would fail constitutional muster. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:57 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The state Supreme Court called up the case for direct review, solely to decide the impact on state and local gun control laws of the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On Monday 12 March 2012, Eady J concluded the hearing of the second application to re-amend the defence in the case of Hunt v Times Newspapers. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:53 pm by Daniel Richardson
 Which judge served as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia after his time on the court? [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Bradshaw, 512 U.S. 107, 122-28 (1994) (extensive prior labor law precedents; provisions of collective bargaining agreement).District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 7:49 am by Charon QC
Applying to federal enclaves only (of which the District of Columbia is one), it was affirmed in 2010 with respect to the states in McDonald-v-Chicago. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
See generally Bexis' book §2.04[1] at footnote 17 (collecting state-of-the-art citations from drug and device cases in 35 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico).So that's one thing - one pretty big thing - that we think is wrong with the anti-preemption rationale in Tucker II. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am by Wolfgang Demino
HILL, Jr., Appellee and Cross-Appellant.No. 05-13-01634-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.Opinion Filed January 26, 2016.773*773 On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
After Judge Cox's introductory remarks, Phil Cave -- speaking on behalf of the Bar Association of the District of Columbia -- made the first presentation to the commission. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
We blogged about the problems with Guinan here.District of ColumbiaThe very first court to permit medical monitoring absent actual injury was a federal "prediction" of District of Columbia law. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
On 21 October 2021, Columbia Global Freedom of Expression are holding an online event, “Courts and Global Norms on Freedom of Expression” (2.00 pm to 5.00pm, BST) Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Gan v Zadravic [2021] NSWDC 533 the NSW District Court refused to dismiss a summary libel claim based on a Facebook post. [read post]